Unit 1 of 4 · B.Com Sem 3

Unit 1: Indian Contract Act

Mercantile Law notes · PTU syllabus (BCOM 302-18)

4 min read5 topics10 exam questions
On this page
  1. Unit summary
  2. Agreement and kinds of contracts
  3. Offer and acceptance
  4. Capacity to contract
  5. Free consent, consideration and legality of object
  6. Performance, discharge and remedies for breach
  7. Key terms
  8. Quick revision
  9. Important questions

Unit summary

The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is the foundation of mercantile law — every sale, loan, job and service rests on a contract. This unit covers agreements and the kinds of contracts (valid, void, voidable, contingent and quasi), offer and acceptance, capacity, free consent, consideration, legality of object, performance and discharge of contracts, and remedies for breach.

After this unit you can

  • Define a contract, state its essentials and classify contracts
  • Explain the rules of offer and acceptance and capacity to contract
  • Explain free consent, consideration and legality of object
  • Explain performance, discharge and remedies for breach

PTU syllabus topics

  • Agreement and kinds of agreements
  • valid
  • void
  • voidable
  • contingent and quasi contracts
  • offer and acceptance
  • capacity to contract
  • free consent
  • consideration
  • legality of object
  • performance and discharge of contract
  • remedies for breach
ClassificationEssentials of a valid contract
Valid contract
  • Offer and acceptance

    Lawful and matching

  • Consideration

    Something of value in return

  • Capacity

    Parties are competent

  • Free consent

    No coercion, fraud or mistake

  • Lawful object

    Not illegal or against policy

1

Topic 1

Agreement and kinds of contracts

Section 2(h): a contract is an agreement enforceable by law. Section 2(e): every promise and every set of promises forming consideration for each other is an agreement. Hence Contract = Agreement + Enforceability; "all contracts are agreements but all agreements are not contracts" (social, domestic and moral agreements are not).

ClassificationEssentials of a valid contract (Section 10)
Valid contract
  • Offer and acceptance

  • Intention to create legal relations

    Balfour v. Balfour (1919) — domestic arrangement not a contract

  • Lawful consideration

  • Capacity of parties

  • Free consent

  • Lawful object

  • Not expressly declared void

  • Certainty and possibility of performance

  • Legal formalities where required

KindMeaningExample
ValidHas all essentials; enforceableSale of a car for ₹5 lakh
Void agreementNot enforceable from the startAgreement with a minor
Void contractValid when made, becomes unenforceable laterContract becomes illegal by a new law
VoidableEnforceable at the option of one partyConsent obtained by coercion
IllegalForbidden by law; collateral agreements also voidAgreement to smuggle goods
UnenforceableValid but cannot be enforced due to a technical defectUnstamped agreement
Contingent (Section 31)Performance depends on a future uncertain eventInsurance, indemnity
Quasi-contract (Sections 68–72)Obligation imposed by law without agreementMoney paid by mistake must be returned
Express / implied / executed / executoryBy formation and performanceBus ride (implied), sale on credit (executory)

Quasi-contracts

  • Supply of necessaries to a person incapable of contracting (Section 68).
  • Payment by an interested person (Section 69).
  • Obligation to pay for non-gratuitous act (Section 70).
  • Finder of goods (Section 71).
  • Money paid or goods delivered by mistake or coercion (Section 72).
2

Topic 2

Offer and acceptance

  • Offer (Section 2(a)): signification of willingness to do or abstain from doing something with a view to obtaining the assent of the other.
  • Types: express or implied; specific or general offer (Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co., 1893); cross offers; counter offer; standing offer.
  • Invitation to offer (price tags, catalogues, tenders, auctions) is not an offer — Pharmaceutical Society v. Boots (1953).
  • Rules of acceptance: absolute and unconditional, communicated to the offeror, in the prescribed or usual manner, within reasonable time, by the offeree, before the offer lapses; silence is not acceptance (Felthouse v. Bindley, 1862).
ProcessCommunication of offer and acceptance (Section 4)
  1. 1Offer complete

    When it comes to the knowledge of the offeree

  2. 2Acceptance complete against the proposer

    When put in course of transmission

  3. 3Acceptance complete against the acceptor

    When it comes to the knowledge of the proposer

  4. 4Revocation of offer

    Any time before acceptance is complete against the proposer

Exam tip

Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt (1913): a person who finds a missing boy without knowing of the reward cannot claim it — acceptance requires knowledge of the offer.

3

Topic 3

Capacity to contract

Section 11: every person is competent who is of the age of majority (18), of sound mind (Section 12) and not disqualified by law.

  • Minor: agreement is void ab initio (Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose, 1903); no ratification on attaining majority; no estoppel; minor can be a beneficiary/promisee; liable for necessaries out of their property (Section 68); can be admitted to the benefits of partnership.
  • Unsound mind: contracts during unsoundness void; lucid intervals allowed.
  • Disqualified persons: alien enemies, foreign sovereigns, convicts, insolvents.
4

Topic 4

Free consent, consideration and legality of object

Consent (Section 13): agreeing upon the same thing in the same sense (consensus ad idem). Free consent (Section 14): not caused by:

ClassificationFactors vitiating free consent
Free consent
  • Coercion (Section 15)

    Threat to commit an act forbidden by IPC/BNS or unlawful detention — voidable

  • Undue influence (Section 16)

    Domination of will by a person in a position of trust — voidable

  • Fraud (Section 17)

    Deliberate false representation — voidable + damages

  • Misrepresentation (Section 18)

    Innocent false statement — voidable

  • Mistake (Sections 20–22)

    Bilateral mistake of fact — void; mistake of law — no relief

Consideration

Section 2(d): when at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained, or does or abstains, or promises to do or abstain from something, such act, abstinence or promise is consideration.

  • Must move at the desire of the promisor; may move from the promisee or any other person (Chinnaya v. Ramayya, 1882); may be past, present or future; need not be adequate; must be real and lawful.
  • "No consideration, no contract" (Section 25) — exceptions: natural love and affection (written and registered), compensation for past voluntary service, promise to pay a time-barred debt (written and signed), agency (Section 185), gifts actually made.

Legality of object (Sections 23–30)

The object or consideration is unlawful if it is forbidden by law, defeats any law, is fraudulent, injures person or property, or is immoral or opposed to public policy.

  • Expressly void agreements: in restraint of marriage (Section 26), restraint of trade (Section 27 — except sale of goodwill), restraint of legal proceedings (Section 28), uncertain agreements (Section 29), wagering agreements (Section 30), agreements to do impossible acts (Section 56).
5

Topic 5

Performance, discharge and remedies for breach

  • Performance: actual performance or tender (offer to perform); by promisor, agent or legal representatives; joint promises — joint and several liability.
ClassificationModes of discharge of contracts
Discharge
  • By performance

    Actual or attempted (tender)

  • By mutual agreement

    Novation, rescission, alteration, remission, waiver

  • By impossibility

    Supervening impossibility — frustration (Taylor v. Caldwell, 1863)

  • By lapse of time

    Limitation Act, 1963

  • By operation of law

    Death, insolvency, merger

  • By breach

    Actual or anticipatory

Remedies for breach

  • Rescission: aggrieved party may cancel the contract (Section 39).
  • Damages (Section 73): ordinary (naturally arising), special (if contemplated by both — Hadley v. Baxendale, 1854), exemplary (breach of promise to marry, dishonour of cheque), nominal; remote damages not recoverable; duty to mitigate loss.
  • Liquidated damages and penalty (Section 74): reasonable compensation not exceeding the stipulated amount.
  • Quantum meruit: payment for work done.
  • Specific performance and injunction (Specific Relief Act, 1963).

Key terms

Contract
An agreement enforceable by law
Voidable contract
Enforceable at the option of one party only
Consideration
Something in return, given at the desire of the promisor
Free consent
Consent not caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation or mistake
Quantum meruit
Payment as much as earned for work done

Quick revision

  • Section 10 essentials; contract = agreement + enforceability.
  • Acceptance complete against proposer when posted.
  • Minor's agreement void ab initio.
  • Consideration may move from any person; exceptions in Section 25.
  • Discharge: performance, agreement, impossibility, time, law, breach; remedies: rescission, damages, quantum meruit, specific performance, injunction.

Important exam questions

Practice questions written to the PTU exam pattern for this unit's syllabus: short answers (Section A style) and long answers (Sections B and C style).

Short-answer questions

  1. Q1.Distinguish void and voidable contracts.
  2. Q2.What is a quasi-contract?
  3. Q3.What is an invitation to offer?
  4. Q4.State the rule in Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose.
  5. Q5.Distinguish coercion and undue influence.
  6. Q6.What is the doctrine of frustration?

Long-answer questions

  1. Q1.Define a contract and explain the essentials of a valid contract.
  2. Q2.Explain the rules regarding offer and acceptance with case laws.
  3. Q3.Explain free consent and consideration with exceptions to "no consideration, no contract".
  4. Q4.Explain the modes of discharge of a contract and remedies for breach.

Stuck on this unit?

Message SBS on WhatsApp for help with Mercantile Law, or to ask about studying B.Com at Synetic.

WhatsApp us